[Solved] Audacity and lame_enc.dll

A problem using LiberKey ?
5 posts • Page 1 of 1

[Solved] Audacity and lame_enc.dll

Postby kokbira » 16 August 2011, 16:39

Why don't you develop a Audacity portable app with lame_enc.dll in its folders? PCWizard and RadioSure have it already, but with old lame_enc.dll versions.
Last edited by kokbira on 17 August 2011, 14:39, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kokbira
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 09 July 2010, 15:09

Re: Audacity and lame_enc.dll

Postby andromede_dc » 16 August 2011, 16:53

Hello,

Have look there :
Audacity Lame Installation
andromede_dc
Iron Boarder
Iron Boarder
 
Posts: 600
Joined: 28 October 2007, 22:55

Re: Audacity and lame_enc.dll

Postby kokbira » 16 August 2011, 20:53

well, i knew about that. i was asking for a portable solution...
User avatar
kokbira
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 09 July 2010, 15:09

Re: Audacity and lame_enc.dll

Postby andromede_dc » 16 August 2011, 22:57

And on this page, did you read Legal issues ?
andromede_dc
Iron Boarder
Iron Boarder
 
Posts: 600
Joined: 28 October 2007, 22:55

Re: Audacity and lame_enc.dll

Postby kokbira » 17 August 2011, 14:36

Sorry, I thought you are only talking about how to install it...

Since PCWizard and RadioSure have it already I also thought that there weren't any legal issues. Thanks for clarifying that.

Legal issues

While the LAME source code is free, the encoding technology that ready-compiled LAME binaries use is patented. The patents are held by Fraunhofer and administered by Thomson. Patenting raises a theoretical possibility that in some countries a user might need to pay a licence fee to legally encode MP3s. This might vary according to the purpose of the encoding and whether the software being used is licensed.

There is no definitive list of countries where the patents unambiguously hold sway. However they are generally assumed to be enforceable in USA, Canada, the EEC and Japan. This means that in these countries (in theory), software that encodes MP3s must be licensed by the patent holders, and that anyone encoding MP3s with unlicensed encoders may also be infringing patents.

The best advice that can be given is that the user makes their own decision, based on their conscience, the country they are in, and taking into account the following:

* The patent holders have tended to enforce licence fees against commercial rather than free MP3 encoders
* Thomson themselves have said that no license is needed by individuals creating music libraries of MP3 files for personal use (interpretations vary whether that sanctions using unlicensed encoders, free or otherwise)
* MP3 patents will expire worldwide between 2010 and 2012
User avatar
kokbira
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 09 July 2010, 15:09


5 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests